Clinical pilot

Test the care pathway—not just the device.

A well-designed ISO Metrik pilot can evaluate patient selection, clinician training, workflow, safety, adherence, outcomes, referral coordination, and implementation feasibility.

Regulatory status: FDA 510(k) pending. ISO Metrik has not received FDA clearance for the proposed clinical uses described here. A website inquiry or pilot discussion is not authorization to enroll, ship, or use an investigational device.

Clinical research and rehabilitation team planning a study
510(k) pendingNot FDA cleared
Pre-enrollmentRegulatory + IRB determination
ProspectiveDefined measures
ControlledDevice accountability

Institutional learning

A pilot should answer operational and clinical questions together.

The goal is to understand whether a defined population can be identified, referred, treated, monitored, and followed using a standardized ISO Metrik pathway. Sample size, study design, access to the device, and site activity must follow the research objective, risk determination, statistical plan, and required approvals.

Pilot questions

What the organization should learn.

01

Patient identification

Can service lines consistently recognize and refer patients who meet the protocol’s clinical criteria?

02

Clinician readiness

Can participating therapists complete training, demonstrate competency, and apply the protocol consistently?

03

Treatment feasibility

Are fit, dosage, visit flow, home practice, and reassessment practical for clinicians and patients?

04

Safety and tolerance

What symptoms, tissue responses, deviations, modifications, or discontinuations occur?

05

Outcome capture

Can the team obtain complete, relevant impairment, functional, participation, and patient-reported measures?

06

Implementation value

Does the pathway support referral coordination, documentation, patient engagement, and responsible scale-up?

Potential stakeholders

Bring the pathway owners to the table early.

Facial neuromuscular care often crosses medical and rehabilitation services. Pilot governance should make responsibilities and escalation routes explicit.

  • Neurology, PM&R, ENT, neurosurgery, or surgical service champions
  • PT, SLP, rehabilitation leadership, and outpatient operations
  • Research, biostatistics, regulatory, compliance, and IRB stakeholders
  • Patient education, data management, and quality improvement
  • Executive sponsor for implementation decisions
Multidisciplinary medical and rehabilitation team coordinating care

Pilot roadmap

Move from question to evidence in six controlled phases.

  1. 1

    Define the use case

    Select the population, care setting, research or quality question, pathway owner, and decision the pilot must inform.

  2. 2

    Determine regulatory and study status

    Before enrollment, document whether the activity is research and whether the device investigation is significant risk, nonsignificant risk, or exempt, with sponsor, IRB, and FDA input as applicable.

  3. 3

    Build the protocol

    Specify eligibility, intervention, training, measures, safety, data handling, oversight, and analysis.

  4. 4

    Prepare sites and clinicians

    Complete approvals, train the team, verify competency, rehearse documentation, and test referral flow.

  5. 5

    Enroll, treat, and monitor after approval

    Begin participant activity only after required approvals are in place, then use prospective tracking, safety review, fidelity checks, and device accountability.

  6. 6

    Analyze and decide

    Report results and limitations, then determine whether to refine, expand, formally study, or stop.

Outcome framework

Measure what matters at four levels.

01

Safety and feasibility

Eligibility yield, training completion, treatment tolerance, deviations, adverse events, and retention.

02

Clinical response

Diagnosis-appropriate facial, oral-motor, speech, swallowing, functional, and patient-reported measures.

03

Patient experience

Usability, confidence, burden, home adherence, and relevance to personal goals.

04

System performance

Referral completion, access, visit workflow, documentation quality, clinician time, and implementation barriers.

Regulatory boundary

FDA 510(k) pending: a pilot must follow the applicable investigational pathway.

A pending 510(k) submission is not FDA clearance, and calling an activity a pilot does not bypass device-investigation or human-subject protection requirements.

FDA 1

Marketing status

510(k) pending is not FDA clearance

ISO Metrik has not received FDA clearance for the proposed clinical uses described on this page. A pending premarket notification does not authorize routine clinical marketing or use.

FDA 2

IDE and IRB pathway

Determine risk status before enrollment

A significant-risk study requires an FDA-approved IDE and IRB approval before initiation. A nonsignificant-risk study requires IRB approval and compliance with abbreviated IDE requirements. Any exempt determination must be supportable.

FDA 3

Human-subject protection

Protect participants and control the device

The applicable pathway may require IRB-approved plans, informed consent, investigational labeling, monitoring, records, reports, and device accountability before and during participant activity.

FDA 4

Investigational-use restriction

Do not promote or commercialize investigational use

Investigational status does not permit promotion, test marketing, commercialization, or representations that the investigational device is safe or effective for the use under study.

Next step

Scope a responsible ISO Metrik pilot.

Bring your population, service lines, clinical question, timeline, governance needs, and intended decision to an initial planning conversation.